I changed the frame rate on the first page and saved and reopened as suggested before making any other changes. Even when set to 2 decimal places it's still 24.00. I'm wondering if this is an excel rounding up thing rather than it not recognising the frame rate has changed? Testing it, when it's asked for number of frames in 1 second it returns 24 though. I've also done a version where I format the E5 cell on the set up page as a number format with 2 decimal places and that has no effect I've gone back over this all a few times to make sure I didn't make a mistake. Is there something fundamental in the macro that prevents decimal places in the frame rate. I might be wrong with I'm about to say so please, anyone who knows better jump in! Obviously the variance will be very small but it's an important fraction over the duration of the Hi again, I've been thinking about this and maybe coming up with more questions than answers. The key thing to remember is that timecode is a reference on a recording for when each complete frame was recorded. The recording still only consists of complete frames, there are no 'point' frames timecode only works with complete frames. How fast you play these frames back (at 23.976, 23.98, 24, 29.97, 30 etc) is a different question and only really becomes relevant when you want to compare your recording with other material (say a sound recording) or a clock in the real world. I think it comes down to what you want to do with the timecode calculations you're making.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |